Search GetCrunchy

Search for categories, articles, and products

Does Thinx Have PFAS?

šŸ“… Updated February 2026ā±ļø 4 min read
⚔

TL;DR

Older Thinx underwear tested positive for alarming levels of PFAS, but the company claims current products are safe. The brand settled a $5 million class-action lawsuit in 2023 over the contamination. While Thinx now uses OEKO-TEX certified materials and third-party testing, their history and continued use of antimicrobial nanosilver earn them a caution rating.

šŸ”‘ Key Findings

1

Independent 2020 testing found up to 3,264 ppm of fluorine (a PFAS indicator) in Thinx underwear.

2

Thinx settled a class-action lawsuit for $5 million in 2023 regarding these chemical contamination claims.

3

The company never admitted wrongdoing but pledged to monitor suppliers to prevent intentional PFAS use.

4

Thinx now publishes third-party testing to prove their current lineup passes total fluorine tests.

The Short Answer

Older Thinx underwear tested positive for alarming levels of PFAS, but the company claims current products are safe. In 2020, independent lab testing found up to 3,264 parts per million (ppm) of fluorine—a key indicator of toxic "forever chemicals"—in the crotch of Thinx underwear.

The brand settled a $5 million class-action lawsuit in 2023. While Thinx denies ever intentionally adding PFAS to their products, they have since overhauled their manufacturing agreements and now publish third-party testing to prove their current lineup is PFAS-free. However, due to their contamination history and continued use of antimicrobial silver treatments, we still give Thinx a caution rating. Is Thinx Safe

Why This Matters

PFAS are "forever chemicals" that accumulate in the human body. They are notoriously linked to a host of health issues, including reproductive harm, immune system disruption, and certain cancers. Is There Pfas In Period Underwear

The vaginal area is highly vascular and absorbs chemicals rapidly. Wearing period underwear contaminated with PFAS means these toxic compounds are placed directly against one of the most sensitive, absorbent parts of your body for hours at a time. Are Organic Pads Worth It

The 3,264 ppm finding was highly significant. According to the nuclear scientist who tested the original products, levels this high strongly suggested the chemicals were intentionally added to create the underwear's signature stain-resistant barrier, rather than being mere background contamination. Which Period Underwear Has Pfas

What's Actually In Thinx Period Underwear

  • PFAS (Historically) — Older pairs contained high levels of fluorine, pointing to polyfluoroalkyl substances used for waterproofing and stain resistance. Period Underwear No Pfas
  • Nanosilver (Agion) — Thinx uses an antimicrobial silver treatment to prevent odors, which can disrupt healthy vaginal flora and environmental waterways. Is Silver In Period Underwear Safe
  • Synthetic Fabrics — Alongside cotton, the leakproof layers rely on polyurethane, elastane, and polyester to trap moisture.

What to Look For

Green Flags:

  • Third-party PFAS testing — Look for brands that publish actual lab results showing non-detectable levels of total fluorine.
  • GOTS Certified Organic Cotton — Ensures the cotton base was grown without synthetic pesticides or harsh chemical fertilizers.
  • PFAS-free guarantees — Seek out brands that explicitly ban forever chemicals in their supply chain contracts.

Red Flags:

  • "Stain-resistant" or "water-repellent" marketing — These buzzwords are often industry code for chemical treatments.
  • Undisclosed odor control — Hidden antimicrobial treatments like nanosilver can irritate sensitive skin and disrupt your pH.
  • Lack of transparency — If a brand refuses to share their lab tests or OEKO-TEX certifications, assume the worst.

The Best Options

If you're looking for leakproof protection without the chemical baggage, skip the legacy brands and choose companies with spotless testing records. Safest Period Underwear

BrandProductVerdictWhy
SaaltWear Everyday Underwearāœ…Routinely tests PFAS-free and avoids controversial nanosilver. Is Saalt Period Underwear Clean
ThinxClassic Period Underwearāš ļøCurrent products test clean, but their history and nanosilver use warrant caution.
KnixLeakproof Underwear🚫Settled a similar PFAS lawsuit after independent tests found fluorine. Is Knix Clean

The Bottom Line

1. Throw away older Thinx. If you bought pairs between 2016 and 2022, they likely contain high levels of PFAS and should be retired.

2. Look for transparent testing. Don't just trust slick marketing claims; demand to see independent lab results for total fluorine.

3. Watch out for silver. Even if a brand is totally PFAS-free, check if they use antimicrobial nanosilver, which carries its own separate health risks.

FAQ

Did Thinx admit to using PFAS?

No, Thinx maintains that PFAS were never part of their product design. In the 2023 settlement, they denied all allegations of wrongdoing, claiming any presence of the chemicals was unintentional contamination from the supply chain.

Is Knix safer than Thinx?

Not necessarily. Knix recently settled its own $1.4 million class-action lawsuit after independent testing revealed fluorine in their period underwear, meaning both major brands share a similar contamination history. Thinx Vs Knix

Can you wash PFAS out of period underwear?

Eventually, but it poisons the water supply. Experts note that while repeated washing might degrade the chemical coating on your underwear, those forever chemicals are simply being flushed down the drain to permanently contaminate local waterways.

šŸ›’ Product Recommendations

āœ…
Wear Everyday Underwear

Saalt

Routinely tests PFAS-free and avoids controversial nanosilver treatments.

Recommended
šŸ‘Œ

Classic Period Underwear

Thinx

Current products test clean, but their history and nanosilver use warrant caution.

Acceptable
🚫

Leakproof Underwear

Knix

Also settled a recent PFAS lawsuit after independent tests found fluorine in their products.

Avoid
āœ…

Boost Boxer

Aisle

Consistently tests non-detect for total fluorine (indicating no PFAS) in independent labs like Mamavation. This B Corp certified brand uses GOTS organic cotton and explicitly bans antimicrobial silver treatments.

Recommended
āœ…
Absorbent Panty

Bambody

A budget-friendly option that holds OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification and has passed independent third-party testing for PFAS. Made primarily from bamboo viscose and cotton, they offer a safer alternative without the high price tag.

Recommended
āœ…

The Heavy

Period.

Founded with a 'no toxic chemicals' mission, this brand's products have tested non-detect for fluorine in multiple independent investigations. They are free from silver nanoparticles and use a simple, safe organic cotton construction.

Recommended
āœ…

Ultimate Midi Brief

WUKA

This UK-based brand (widely available globally) maintains a strict 'no silver, no PFAS' policy. Independent testing by consumer group *Which?* confirmed their products are free from the high levels of antimicrobial silver found in competitors.

Recommended
āœ…

Leakproof Undies

Revol Cares

Tests clean for fluorine (PFAS) and features a high-absorbency design without controversial chemical finishes. Their manufacturing process emphasizes non-toxic materials, verified by third-party lab results.

Recommended
āœ…

Jade Cotton Brief

Lilova

Independent lab testing found no detectable organic fluorine in these briefs, clearing them of PFAS concerns. They utilize organic cotton for the body and avoid antimicrobial additives that can disrupt the vaginal microbiome.

Recommended
āœ…

Period & Leak Proof Brief

Boody

Made from organically grown bamboo, this brand has achieved third-party verification for being PFAS-free. The fabric is naturally breathable and hypoallergenic without relying on synthetic chemical coatings.

Recommended
āœ…

First Line Leakproof Boxer

TomboyX

A gender-inclusive option that tested non-detect for PFAS in independent consumer studies. These boxers provide full coverage and leak protection using OEKO-TEX certified fabrics without toxic finishes.

Recommended
āœ…

Period Shorts

Goat Union

One of the few Amazon-centric brands to transparently publish their own third-party PFAS testing results showing non-detect levels. Users report they perform well for heavy flows without the chemical odor associated with cheaper synthetics.

Recommended
āœ…

Period Panties

Neione

Another affordable option that claims PFAS-free status and utilizes OEKO-TEX certified materials. Independent spot-checks have found them to be free of the high fluorine levels seen in legacy brands.

Recommended
āœ…

Day Pad

GladRags

For those preferring pads, this reusable cotton option is free from the plastics and superabsorbent polymers found in disposables. Being simple cloth, they naturally lack the waterproof PFAS coatings often added to synthetic underwear.

Recommended
āœ…

Minky/Bamboo Cloth Pads

Tree Hugger Cloth Pads

Handmade in Canada, this brand has paid for and published independent testing proving their fabrics are PFAS-free. A safe, reusable alternative for those who want to avoid the synthetic materials in leakproof underwear.

Recommended
āœ…

Organic Cotton Period Panties

Hesta Organic

Focuses on GOTS certified organic cotton for maximum breathability and minimal chemical exposure. Their simple construction avoids the complex synthetic layers where PFAS and silver treatments usually hide.

Recommended
🚫

Leakproof Underwear

Proof

Independent testing by Mamavation found extremely high levels of fluorine (234 ppm) in the crotch area. This level strongly suggests the intentional use of PFAS for water resistance.

Avoid
🚫

Period Panties

Victoria's Secret / PINK

Spot checks have detected fluorine levels around 20 ppm, indicating potential PFAS contamination. As a mass-market brand, their supply chain transparency regarding chemical finishes lags behind dedicated health-focused companies.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Sustain Natural

Despite the 'natural' branding, independent lab tests revealed significant fluorine levels (up to 71 ppm) in their products. This contradiction between marketing claims and test results makes them a brand to avoid.

Avoid
🚫

Period Panties

Joyja

Lab results showed detectable fluorine (18 ppm), signaling the presence of forever chemicals. Consumers seeking a truly non-toxic product should opt for brands with a consistent track record of 'non-detect' results.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Panty's

Testing identified 37 ppm of fluorine in these products, a clear indicator of PFAS treatment. The presence of these persistent chemicals outweighs their aesthetic or functional claims.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Red Ruby Box

Failed independent testing with fluorine levels around 27 ppm. While lower than the worst offenders, it still indicates unnecessary chemical exposure in a highly sensitive area.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Maxim Hygiene

Another brand where 'hygiene' marketing doesn't match the lab results, which showed 26 ppm of fluorine. Honest transparency is key in this category, and these detectable levels are a red flag.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Ruby Love

Independent testing found over 20 ppm of fluorine in their products. Users also report mixed performance, making them a poor choice compared to verified PFAS-free alternatives.

Avoid
🚫
Comfort Period Underwear

Hanes

Lacks transparent third-party testing for PFAS. User reports of water 'beading' on the fabric—a classic sign of DWR (durable water repellent) chemical treatments—warrant avoidance until they prove otherwise.

Avoid
āš ļø

Period Pants

Bodyform (Intima)

Consumer group *Which?* found exceptionally high levels of silver (126.7 mg/kg) in these pants. While they may be PFAS-free, the heavy use of antimicrobial biocides raises separate health concerns.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Period Knickers

Marks & Spencer

Testing revealed high silver content (57.8 mg/kg), used as an odor-control biocide. Many health experts advise avoiding unnecessary antimicrobial treatments in products worn against mucous membranes.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Period Underwear

Cora

While generally a cleaner brand, some tests have detected low levels of fluorine (13-14 ppm). Additionally, their use of silver technology for odor control places them in the 'caution' category for those wanting a completely additive-free product.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Reusable Period Underwear

Rael

Lab tests found low but detectable levels of fluorine (approx. 15 ppm). While better than the worst offenders, they do not meet the strict 'non-detect' standard of the recommended brands.

Use Caution
āš ļø

AIRism Absorbent Sanitary Shorts

Uniqlo

Contains silver-based biocides for odor control (confirmed by testing). Furthermore, the synthetic AIRism fabric is less breathable than organic cotton options, which can be an issue for long-term wear.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Modibodi (Older Styles)

Modibodi

While the brand is phasing out silver in 2024+, older stock and certain lines contained detectable antimicrobial silver (0.9 mg/kg). Verify you are buying the newest silver-free versions before purchasing.

Use Caution

šŸ’” We don't accept payment for recommendations. Some links may be affiliate links.

šŸ“– Related Research

🌸

Explore more

More about Feminine Care

Your body deserves better