Search GetCrunchy

Search for categories, articles, and products

Thinx vs Knix?

šŸ“… Updated February 2026ā±ļø 5 min read
⚔

TL;DR

Knix is the better option for performance and transparency, but both brands carry historical baggage. Both companies settled multi-million dollar class-action lawsuits after PFAS were found in their products. While new 2025 laws forced them to remove these chemicals, we still recommend safer, fully transparent alternatives.

šŸ”‘ Key Findings

1

Thinx settled a $4 million lawsuit after tests found 3,264 ppm of fluorine, suggesting intentional PFAS use.

2

Knix settled a $1.4 million lawsuit in 2024 for misleading "100% PFAS-free" marketing claims.

3

California and New York banned PFAS in all apparel starting January 1, 2025, forcing industry-wide changes.

4

Thinx explicitly uses Agion, a nanosilver antimicrobial treatment that can disrupt your vaginal microbiome.

The Short Answer

If you are choosing between the two heavyweights of period underwear, Knix is the better investment for both performance and transparency. However, both brands carry significant historical baggage regarding toxic chemicals.

Both companies settled multi-million dollar class-action lawsuits between 2023 and 2024 after independent testing found PFAS (forever chemicals) in their products. While strict 2025 state laws have forced both brands to eliminate intentional PFAS, we still recommend proceeding with caution and considering verified non-toxic competitors instead. Safest Period Underwear

Why This Matters

The period underwear industry exploded on the promise of safe, eco-friendly menstrual care. But in 2020, independent lab testing revealed extremely high levels of fluorine—an indicator of PFAS—in the crotch of Thinx underwear. Does Thinx Have Pfas

PFAS are "forever chemicals" that do not break down in the human body or the environment. The skin around the vulva is highly vascular and incredibly absorbent, meaning any chemical coatings in your underwear have a direct, fast-tracked pathway into your bloodstream. Is There Pfas In Period Underwear

Following the Thinx scandal, testing eventually caught up with their biggest competitor. While Thinx's high levels (over 3,000 ppm) suggested intentional chemical waterproofing, Knix was sued for misleading "100% PFAS-free" marketing after trace amounts were discovered in their garments. Is Knix Clean

Now that California and New York have officially banned PFAS in textiles as of 2025, both brands have legally binding agreements to monitor their supply chains. Still, many crunchy consumers are rightfully choosing to spend their money with brands that didn't need a lawsuit to prioritize safety. Period Underwear No Pfas

What's Actually In Period Underwear

Both brands use a multi-layer system to pull moisture away from the body and trap it. Here is exactly what is touching your skin:

  • Polyurethane Laminate (PUL) — This is the ultra-thin plastic layer that makes the underwear leakproof. It is standard across the industry, but manufacturing cleanliness varies wildly between brands.
  • Agion Antimicrobial Treatment — Openly used by Thinx. This is a nanosilver treatment used to control odor, but it can potentially disrupt your natural vaginal microbiome and wash into local waterways. Is Silver In Period Underwear Safe
  • Synthetic Fabrics — Knix heavily relies on nylon and spandex to achieve its famous seamless feel. While highly comfortable, synthetics trap heat and moisture, which can increase your risk of yeast infections compared to organic cotton.

What to Look For

Green Flags:

  • Third-Party Lab Results — The safest brands openly publish their independent fluorine testing results, rather than hiding behind vague marketing terms.
  • Organic Cotton Gussets — The top layer directly touching your skin should be a breathable, natural fiber to support a healthy pH.
  • Undetectable Fluorine — Look for brands that guarantee "undetectable" levels of total fluorine, which is the only reliable way to screen for all 9,000+ types of PFAS.

Red Flags:

  • "Stain-Resistant" Claims — This phrase is historically an industry code word for chemical coatings like PFAS or Teflon.
  • Nanosilver Treatments — Often used to mask the smell of trapped blood, but heavy metals do not belong near your vulva.
  • Opaque Supply Chains — If a brand refuses to explicitly name what materials create their waterproof barrier, it is best to avoid them entirely.

The Best Options

If you are moving away from the drama of Thinx and Knix, there are better options on the market. These alternatives prioritize clean materials without sacrificing leak protection. Is Saalt Period Underwear Clean

BrandProductVerdictWhy
SaaltSaalt Wearāœ…Consistently tests undetectable for PFAS and uses clean, transparent materials.
AislePeriod Underwearāœ…Features 100% organic cotton options with a verified clean supply chain.
KnixLeakproof Underwearāš ļøBetter performance than Thinx, but recently settled a massive marketing lawsuit.
ThinxPeriod Underwear🚫History of dangerously high PFAS levels and uses controversial silver treatments.

The Bottom Line

1. Ditch the Thinx. They had the highest recorded levels of forever chemicals in the industry and still use microbiome-disrupting silver. Is Thinx Safe

2. Knix is acceptable but not perfect. They offer superior comfort and leak protection, but their past marketing claims lacked total transparency.

3. Upgrade to verified clean brands. Companies like Saalt and Aisle built their products without toxic chemical shortcuts from day one.

FAQ

Do Thinx and Knix still have PFAS?

Both brands are legally required to test for and eliminate PFAS under their recent lawsuit settlements and the 2025 California textile ban. While intentional PFAS use has stopped, trace contamination can still occur through shared factory machinery. Is There Pfas In Period Underwear

Which brand holds more liquid?

In long-term community testing, Knix consistently outperforms Thinx for heavy flows. Users report that Knix's core absorbs liquid significantly faster and holds up to two tampons' worth without feeling like a bulky diaper.

Why does my period underwear smell?

Thinx users frequently report a "rotting" smell developing after a few months of use. This happens because blood proteins get permanently trapped in the synthetic layers as the chemical antimicrobial treatments gradually wash out.

šŸ›’ Product Recommendations

āœ…
Saalt Wear

Saalt

Consistently tests undetectable for PFAS and utilizes verified clean materials.

Recommended
šŸ‘Œ

Leakproof Underwear

Knix

Superior performance and comfort, but a history of misleading marketing requires caution.

Acceptable
🚫
Period Underwear

Thinx

Highest historical levels of forever chemicals and relies on controversial nanosilver treatments.

Avoid
āœ…

Period Underwear

Revol Cares

This Canadian brand consistently tests **non-detect for organic fluorine** (PFAS) in independent labs. Their construction relies on bamboo and organic cotton rather than synthetic blends, offering a breathable, verified clean option.

Recommended
āœ…

Period & Leak Proof Underwear

Modibodi

As of 2024, Modibodi **removed all silver antimicrobial treatments** from their line and continues to test non-detect for PFAS. They use a mix of merino wool and bamboo for natural odor control without heavy metals.

Recommended
āœ…

Absorbent Underwear

Lilova

Lilova is one of the few brands to achieve **'non-detect' results for fluorine** in multiple rounds of independent testing. They use organic cotton for the body and gusset, ensuring no synthetics touch your most sensitive skin.

Recommended
āœ…
Period. Underwear

The Period Company

A top budget-friendly pick that holds **UL Validation for 'PFAS Not Detected'**. Unlike many affordable brands that cut corners, they provide transparent safety data and avoid toxic additives.

Recommended
āœ…

Period Pants

WUKA

This UK-based certified B Corp uses **GOTS-certified organic cotton** and has verified their products are PFAS-free. They are fully transparent about their supply chain and avoid the use of silver treatments.

Recommended
āœ…
Absorbent Panties

Bambody

An accessible Amazon favorite that actually passes safety checks; independent testing in 2021 and 2023 found **no detectable fluorine**. They use bamboo viscose for a softer, naturally moisture-wicking fabric.

Recommended
āœ…

First Line Period Underwear

TomboyX

Known for gender-inclusive boxer styles, their period line is **OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certified** and the brand shares their own lab reports showing no detectable PFAS. A great option for full-coverage protection.

Recommended
āœ…

Leakproof Underwear

Intimate Portal

Another budget-friendly option that surprisingly passed independent fluorine testing with **non-detectable levels**. They offer simple cotton-rich designs that don't rely on heavy chemical coatings.

Recommended
āœ…

Hello Undies

Hello Period

This New Zealand brand holds **OEKO-TEX certification** and has been independently tested by UL to confirm their gussets are free from fluorine. They use a patented technology that avoids the need for toxic waterproofing.

Recommended
āœ…
Beautifully Confident Period Underwear

Bali

A rare mainstream mall brand that **tested non-detect for fluorine** in independent labs. While they use more synthetics than crunchy brands, they are a safe, accessible option found in major department stores.

Recommended
āœ…
Reusable Cloth Pads

GladRags

A pioneer in reusable care, these pads are made from simple **100% cotton** with no plastic backing or chemical additives. They rely on mechanical absorbency (layers of fabric) rather than chemical treatments.

Recommended
āœ…

Reusable Pads

Tree Hugger Cloth Pads

This brand publicly posts their **passing PFAS test results** for all fabrics used. They use water-resistant fleece instead of PUL plastic, increasing breathability.

Recommended
āœ…

Organic Cotton Tampons & Pads

Natracare

Consistently tests **zero trace for PFAS** in independent studies. Unlike some 'organic' brands that fail due to packaging contamination, Natracare maintains a strictly clean supply chain.

Recommended
āœ…

Leakproof Period Panties

Innersy

A popular choice for teens, this brand's 'Big Girls' line tested **non-detect for organic fluorine**. It is an affordable, safe entry point for younger users starting their cycle.

Recommended
āœ…

Period Underwear

Fri Period

Holds **OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification** and explicitly guarantees no PFAS or nanosilver. They focus on simple, safe materials without the 'performance' chemicals that cause toxicity.

Recommended
🚫

Hipster Period Underwear

Proof

Independent testing found **extremely high levels of fluorine (over 100 ppm)** in this product. Such high levels typically indicate intentional use of PFAS for stain resistance.

Avoid
🚫

Period Underwear

Ruby Love

Despite marketing their 'smart' technology, independent labs detected **fluorine contamination above 10 ppm**. This suggests their supply chain is not as clean as claimed.

Avoid
āš ļø

Period Panties

Victoria's Secret / PINK

Independent testing has flagged this brand for **detectable levels of fluorine**, and they heavily utilize synthetic materials like polyamide which can trap heat and bacteria.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Everyday Liners

The Honey Pot

While their tampons tested clean, independent labs found **38 ppm of organic fluorine** in their 'organic' cotton liners. This inconsistency suggests potential cross-contamination in their liner manufacturing.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Organic Cotton Liners

Cora

Similar to Honey Pot, Cora's organic liners tested positive for **30 ppm of fluorine**. While their underwear marketing claims safety, this liner result casts doubt on their broader quality control.

Use Caution
🚫

Period Underwear

Joyja

This brand was flagged in independent investigations for **detectable levels of fluorine**. They lack the third-party transparency reports provided by safer competitors.

Avoid
āš ļø
Comfort Period Underwear

Hanes

The company relies on the vague claim that they do not 'intentionally add' PFAS, but **refuses to provide independent test results**. Without transparency, their low price point is a risk.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Period Underwear

Sustain Natural

Despite the 'Natural' name, independent spot-checking found **indications of fluorine**. In the world of period care, 'natural' is a marketing term, not a safety guarantee.

Use Caution
🚫

Organic Cotton Pads

Maxim Hygiene

One of the worst performers in independent testing, with **28 ppm fluorine** found in their organic cotton tampons/pads. This proves that 'organic' cotton can still be processed with toxic chemicals.

Avoid
🚫
Disposable Period Underwear

Always Discreet

Testing revealed **15 ppm of fluorine** in these disposable garments. They are also made almost entirely of plastic and synthetic polymers, creating a hot, non-breathable environment.

Avoid
āš ļø

Period Underwear

AWWA

This brand considers a test result of **under 100 ppm** to be 'non-detect.' Safer brands use a standard of 10 ppm, meaning AWWA's products could still contain significant trace chemicals.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Period Underwear

Panty's

Flagged in independent investigations for **detectable fluorine levels**. As a major international brand, their lack of public, low-level detection testing is a red flag.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Period Underwear

June

Included in broad industry testing but failed to make the 'non-detect' lists of safer brands like Lilova and Saalt. Their safety data is less transparent than recommended competitors.

Use Caution
🚫
Daily Pantiliners

Amazon Basics

Lab tests found **12 ppm of fluorine**, indicating PFAS contamination. These budget liners likely use the cheapest available materials with poor supply chain oversight.

Avoid
🚫

Liners

Incognito by Prevail

Tested with **51 ppm of fluorine**, one of the higher levels found in panty liners. This level suggests a significant presence of chemical treatments.

Avoid

šŸ’” We don't accept payment for recommendations. Some links may be affiliate links.

šŸ“– Related Research

🌸

Explore more

More about Feminine Care

Your body deserves better