Search GetCrunchy

Search for categories, articles, and products

Period Underwear vs Pads?

šŸ“… Updated February 2026ā±ļø 4 min read
⚔

TL;DR

Choosing between period underwear and pads comes down to weighing environmental impact against chemical exposure risks. Traditional pads generate massive plastic waste and often contain endocrine-disrupting VOCs, while many period underwear brands have tested positive for toxic PFAS. Your safest and most sustainable option is choosing verified PFAS-free period underwear.

šŸ”‘ Key Findings

1

An average person uses 11,000 to 17,000 disposable pads or tampons in their lifetime.

2

Standard sanitary pads are made of nearly 90% plastic and take 500 to 800 years to decompose.

3

A 2025 university study found endocrine-disrupting chemicals (phthalates and bisphenols) in 100% of the conventional sanitary pads tested.

4

Independent lab testing has found indications of toxic PFAS "forever chemicals" in 65% of period underwear brands.

The Short Answer

The ultimate verdict is that it depends entirely on the specific brand you buy. Conventional disposable pads are an environmental nightmare loaded with plastics and hormone disruptors, but many popular period underwear brands are contaminated with toxic "forever chemicals."

For the safest and most sustainable cycle, verified PFAS-free period underwear is the clear winner. If you prefer disposable options, you must stick to 100% organic, unbleached cotton pads to avoid the harsh volatile organic compounds (VOCs) found in drugstore brands. Period Underwear Vs Pads

Why This Matters

Comparing period underwear and pads isn't just a matter of comfort—it's a choice between two entirely different types of toxic exposure. Traditional disposable pads sit directly against highly permeable vaginal tissue, giving synthetic chemicals a fast track into your bloodstream. Are Pads Safe

The environmental toll of disposable pads is staggering. The average menstruating person uses up to 17,000 disposable products in their lifetime. Because standard pads are made of up to 90% plastic, each one takes roughly 500 to 800 years to break down in a landfill. Is Plastic In Pads Bad

Period underwear solves this massive plastic waste crisis, but it introduces a new chemical threat. Independent lab testing has found PFAS "forever chemicals" in 65% of period underwear brands. You have to know exactly what you are buying to avoid swapping plastic pollution for permanent chemical buildup in your body. Is There Pfas In Period Underwear

What's Actually In These Products

  • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) — Found in many conventional scented pads. These industrial chemicals vaporize at room temperature and have been linked to reproductive harm. Are There Chemicals In Pads
  • PFAS "Forever Chemicals" — Used as waterproofing agents in many period underwear brands. PFAS are linked to hormonal disruptions, fertility issues, and immune system suppression. Which Period Underwear Has Pfas
  • Superabsorbent Polymers (SAPs) — The petroleum-derived gel inside most conventional pads. SAPs hold massive amounts of liquid but lock in moisture and heat, increasing the risk of bacterial infections. Are Scented Pads Bad
  • Phthalates & Bisphenols — Plasticizers often used in conventional pad backings and wrappers. A recent 2025 university study found these endocrine-disrupting chemicals in 100% of the conventional pads they tested.

What to Look For

Green Flags:

  • Third-party PFAS testing — Look for period underwear brands that actively test their final products and publish their non-detect results. Period Underwear No Pfas
  • 100% certified organic cotton — For pads, this ensures you aren't being exposed to pesticide residues like glyphosate. Are Organic Pads Worth It

Red Flags:

  • "Stain-resistant" or "waterproof" claims — In period underwear, these marketing buzzwords are often code for toxic PFAS chemical treatments. Is Period Underwear Safe
  • Synthetic fragrances — In pads, "odor control" usually means a cocktail of undisclosed synthetic chemicals that irritate sensitive tissue.

The Best Options

If you want the environmental benefits of reusable underwear without the chemical burden, you must choose verified clean brands. Check our full guides on the Safest Period Underwear and Safest Pad Brand for a deeper dive.

BrandProductVerdictWhy
SaaltPeriod Underwearāœ…Scored non-detect for PFAS in recent Mamavation testing. Is Saalt Period Underwear Clean
RaelOrganic Cotton Padsāœ…Made with 100% organic cotton and zero synthetic fragrances. Is Rael Pads Clean
ThinxPeriod Underwearāš ļøSettled a major lawsuit over PFAS contamination, though they claim to be clean now. Does Thinx Have Pfas
AlwaysUltra Thin Pads🚫Made with synthetic plastics, SAPs, and artificial fragrance cocktails. Is Always Pads Safe

The Bottom Line

1. Invest in PFAS-free period underwear. It is the most sustainable option and eliminates monthly plastic waste, but you must verify the brand's testing data. Safest Period Underwear

2. Never buy scented conventional pads. If you use disposables, choose 100% organic cotton pads to avoid phthalates, VOCs, and synthetic plastics. Are Scented Pads Bad

3. Don't fall for "chemical-free" marketing. Recent studies show even some "natural" disposable pads contain hormone-disrupting chemicals due to manufacturing contamination.

FAQ

Is period underwear better for the environment than pads?

Yes, reusable underwear significantly reduces your lifetime carbon footprint. While manufacturing them requires more energy upfront, one pair can replace up to 200 disposable pads, keeping hundreds of years' worth of plastic out of landfills.

Does all period underwear have PFAS in it?

No, but you must be incredibly careful which brand you choose. While historical testing found PFAS in 65% of brands, companies like Saalt and Knix have reformulated and recently scored non-detect in independent lab testing. Thinx Vs Knix

Are organic pads actually safer?

Organic pads are safer than conventional, but they aren't perfect. They eliminate direct pesticide exposure and synthetic fragrances, but some independent testing has still found trace levels of phthalates migrating from the plastic backing. Are Organic Pads Worth It

šŸ›’ Product Recommendations

āœ…
Period Underwear

Saalt

Scored non-detect for PFAS in recent independent lab testing.

Recommended
šŸ‘Œ
Organic Cotton Pads

Rael

Made with 100% organic cotton, avoiding synthetic plastics and fragrances.

Acceptable
🚫
Ultra Thin Pads

Always

Made with synthetic plastics, superabsorbent polymers, and artificial fragrances.

Avoid
āœ…

Aisle Period Underwear

Aisle

This is one of the only brands to score non-detect for PFAS in two separate independent investigations (Mamavation and Sierra Club). Their signature 'Truetex' fabric is Oeko-Tex Standard 100 certified and verified free of the toxic silver antimicrobial treatments used by competitors.

Recommended
āœ…
Organic Cotton Pads

Natracare

Unlike many 'natural' brands that still use plastic backings, these are completely plastic-free and home compostable. They rely on a wood pulp core rather than petroleum-based superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) to lock in moisture.

Recommended
āœ…

The Period Company Underwear

Period.

A highly affordable option that has consistently tested non-detect for fluorine (PFAS) in independent lab reports. They avoid all biocidal chemical treatments, such as silver or zinc pyrithione, which can disrupt healthy vaginal bacteria.

Recommended
āœ…
Day & Night Pads

August

This Gen Z-founded brand uses 100% organic cotton with a fluff pulp core instead of synthetic SAP gels. Their wrappers are certified home compostable, dissolving in soil within months rather than persisting for centuries.

Recommended
āœ…

100% Cotton Pads

Organyc

These pads are distinguished by being 100% cotton throughout, including the absorbent core, rather than just having a cotton 'topsheet' over a synthetic middle. They contain zero superabsorbent polymers, powders, or wood pulp fillers.

Recommended
šŸ‘Œ

Bamboo Period Pads

Flo

Made from Oeko-Tex certified organic bamboo and corn fiber, these are naturally soft and hypoallergenic. While they are free of chlorine bleach and dyes, note that they do use a plant-based 'bioplastic' backing which requires industrial composting.

Acceptable
šŸ‘Œ

Organic Cotton Cover Pads (Non-Herbal)

The Honey Pot

Their standard organic pads are a solid choice with a certified organic cotton topsheet and no chlorine bleaching. However, use caution with their 'herbal' line, as the infused mint and lavender oils can cause burning or irritation for some users.

Acceptable
āœ…

Bamboo Viscose Underwear

Wuka

This UK-based brand (widely available in the US) uses Tencel Modal and GOTS-certified organic cotton. They publish rigorous chemical testing results confirming their products are free from PFAS and silver treatments.

Recommended
āœ…
Reusable Cloth Pads

GladRags

A pioneer in reusable care, these are simple, effective snap-around pads made entirely of cotton cloth. They contain absolutely no plastics, PUL waterproofing, or synthetic fillers, making them the most breathable option available.

Recommended
āœ…

Period Underwear (2024+ Stock)

Modibodi

While older versions used silver treatments, the brand announced a reformulation in 2024 to remove antimicrobial silver from their entire range. They have also consistently tested non-detect for PFAS in recent independent audits.

Recommended
āš ļø

L. Organic Core Tampons & Pads

L. Organic

Despite the '100% Organic' marketing, this brand (owned by P&G) has faced class-action lawsuits for using titanium dioxide to whiten their products. Ingredient disclosures also reveal the use of paraffin and polyester components in the absorbent cores.

Use Caution
🚫
Infinity FlexFoam Pads

Always

These pads are made almost entirely of polyurethane foam—the same material used in insulation and sofa cushions. They represent a significant source of non-biodegradable plastic waste and contain undisclosed synthetic additives.

Avoid
🚫
Clean & Secure Pads

U by Kotex

Ingredient transparency sheets reveal these pads contain 'Styrene/Isoprene Copolymer' (a synthetic rubber) and 'Hydrocarbon Resin.' They also utilize titanium dioxide for whitening, which serves no functional purpose for hygiene.

Avoid
🚫
Stayfree Maxi Pads

Stayfree

These pads heavily rely on 'Odor Neutralizers' like ethylene brassylate and phenoxyethanol, which are synthetic chemical irritants. The absorbent core is standard wood pulp mixed with petroleum-derived superabsorbent polymers.

Avoid
āš ļø

Period Underwear (Original)

Thinx

The brand settled a $5 million class-action lawsuit in 2023 after independent testing found high levels of PFAS (up to 3,264 ppm) and silver nanoparticles in their products. While they claim to have reformulated, trust in their transparency remains low.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Ultra-Thin Pads (Chlorine Free)

Seventh Generation

Although marketed as 'natural,' their ingredient disclosures list titanium dioxide in the backsheet and sodium polyacrylate (SAP) in the core. Many consumers report they were discontinued in stores, possibly due to these formulation controversies.

Use Caution
āš ļø

Leakproof Underwear

Knix

Knix settled a $1.4 million lawsuit in 2024 regarding misleading marketing after tests found fluorine (an indicator of PFAS) in their 'High Rise' and 'Boyshort' models. Like Thinx, they deny intentional use, but the detection levels were concerning.

Use Caution
🚫

Period Underwear

Victoria's Secret / PINK

These products rely heavily on synthetic 'moisture-wicking' fabrics (polyamide/elastane) rather than natural fibers. Historical spot-checks have found high levels of fluorine in their synthetic-style panties.

Avoid
🚫

Generic 'Bamboo' Underwear

NoBlood / Amazon Generics

Cheap generic brands flooding online marketplaces often claim to be 'bamboo' but are chemically processed rayon with no third-party purity testing. They lack Oeko-Tex certification, meaning there is no check on formaldehyde or heavy metal residues.

Avoid
āš ļø

Leakproof Period Underwear

Proof

In 2020/2021 testing by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Mamavation, this brand's products showed high levels of fluorine (indication of PFAS). No recent independent public data has cleared them of this finding.

Use Caution

šŸ’” We don't accept payment for recommendations. Some links may be affiliate links.

šŸ“– Related Research

🌸

Explore more

More about Feminine Care

Your body deserves better